The newest survey consisted of step three bits. Part I incorporated concerns out of socio-demographic analysis (years, quantity of knowledge, parity, familial money, occupation, latest relationship condition, sexual interest, reputation for HPV inoculation, and you can reputation of irregular cervical cancer tumors tests).
Region II made up of six questions about the mark women that would be screened, ages first off, regularity, many years otherwise criteria to prevent out of examination, and techniques off evaluating. Precisely the players that has ever heard regarding HPV carry out go-ahead in order to Area III and that examined knowledge about HPV of the type of (oncogenic or low-oncogenic), means out-of sign and you can prevention.
Before the research, the fresh new questionnaire regarding part II and you will area III from inside the Thai type have been contemplated, talked about, and you can revised up to consensus one of 20 boffins who were all gynecologic oncologists (specific was in fact experts various other synchronous education). The pros rated all of 19 concerns because sometimes ‘relevant’ otherwise ‘maybe not relevant’. The item-top Articles Validity List (I-CVI) try computed for every goods, while the Articles Legitimacy Index (CVI) is actually calculated if you take an average proportion out-of fourteen questions relating to knowledge about cervical cancer tumors evaluating and you can 5 questions regarding HPV. This new CVI was step one for parts of the latest questionnaire (S1 Desk). New reliability is actually checked out inside 29 feminine with the same attribute as the people. This new Cronbach’ leader coefficients towards accuracy was in fact 0.819 to possess information about cervical disease testing and you can 0.907 for understanding of HPV.
Towards the big date of arranged colposcopy, the study secretary considering advice of your own study on the female which met addition conditions. The ladies who accessible to participate offered composed told agree and you may replied the newest survey by themselves themselves just before proceeding in order to colposcopy.
Investigation gathered because of it research have been socio-demographic analysis (Part We of your questionnaire), experience in cervical disease evaluating (Area II), and you will experience in HPV (Part III).
The brand new responses of knowledge on cervical malignant tumors testing and you can HPV had been analyzed by the for each and every items prior to scoring categorization. Correct address are obtained as the step 1 whereas ‘completely wrong and being unsure of answer’ is scored 0.
Out of 14 issues away from cervical disease evaluating, feminine whose rating was basically ? 10 was indeed arbitrarily classified once the with ‘a knowledge’ or else was in fact considered as that have “not good knowledge”. Getting knowledge of HPV, feminine whose answer try ‘never been aware of HPV’ had Skotsk kvinder til Г¦gteskab been omitted regarding the research out-of HPV knowledge.
Off 5 concerns, feminine whose rating was in fact ? 3 was in fact regarded as that have ‘an effective experience in HPV’ usually since the ‘negative knowledge’. Off 19 inquiries, women whoever get was basically ? thirteen was classified since the having ‘an excellent total knowledge’ if not because ‘bad overall knowledge’.
All the research was in fact built-up within the an electronic digital databases and you will reviewed playing with SPSS V.twenty six.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chi town, IL, USA). Detailed analytics were utilized to research demographic study and you may have been summarized because the wide variety that have commission, mean that have standard deviation otherwise average that have diversity. The fresh new association between for each and every varying and you will training rating was basically analyzed having fun with simple linear regression. Exploratory model was developed inside the multivariable research along with every variables probably pertaining to the data get. The newest believed quantity of analytical relevance was an effective p-value of 0.05 or less.
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>